asebotrack.blogg.se

Canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3
Canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3






canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3
  1. #CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 INSTALL#
  2. #CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 UPGRADE#
  3. #CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 SOFTWARE#
  4. #CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 TRIAL#

#CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 TRIAL#

Atleast they give a 14 day trial download, which I'll probably try. hmm my sarcasm on 'squeeze' is justified.Įnough dissing man. Note: The next version of Squeeze, version 5.0, will offer watermarking with any type of filter. Only QuickTime filters offer watermarking, so this is a two-step process.

canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3 canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3

You can use Squeeze to add a watermark to your videos, so that other sites won’t rip you off. I like the sound of the watermark but this review: I aslo see why it's called squeeze - you get the word 'pro' printed on the box for an extra $200 for which you get.? well the 'extras' page is a broken link. 'hey wow' twangy approach - I'm sure they don't talk this way at home.

#CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 SOFTWARE#

Thank-you for the link Runaround - though I couldn't watch all the tutorial - software tutors always have a u.s.

#CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 UPGRADE#

(Typically we just bought 4.5 Pro upgrade a few weeks ago!) This is a link to the video presentation which is quite well done re- explanations (meaning even I could follow it all!): Worth a look. Have you seen the new specs for newly released Sorenson Squeeze 5? I like the easy watermark feature and looks much faster. Hope this helps, I do think you will not regret buying PC3! This seems to finally nail this problem that is common across virtually all NLE's when down coverting footage from the better cams that include lots of fine detail. The down converted footage will be excellent unless there is lot's of fine horizontal detail such as brickwork or mesh, in which case the solution is to use the technique employing VirtualDub and it's sophisticated Lanzcross3 resizing algorithm to frame serve to PC3. Lastly, in case you are down converting from HDV to SD be aware that PC3 can render to BD compliant format m2v and SD m2v/ac3 in almost the same time as only rendering the HD stuff, just add multiple targets including a rec 709 to rec 601 filter on the SD stuff, go to bed and wake up to all done. Oh, and before I forget beware that the presets in PC3 for SD output that include the AC3 option don't work! The workaround is to de-select audio in the elementary stream template and simply add a separate AC3 audio template and save that combo. So don't be fooled as I was by WMP classic. Playing the same files in VLC player they are nice and sharp, just like they will look when burnt to DVD and played on a decent telly. In my opinion Procoder is definitely better than Adobe's media encoder solutions which I believe use the Mainconcept codec as I think does some other NLE's including Vegas (at least for MPEG).īe careful what method you use to compare ouput from any media encoder, I used to think Procoder was not so good until I discovered that it was soft entirely due to watching it in Windows media player classic which blends fields in a dumb way.

#CANOPUS PROCODER 2 VS PROCODER 3 INSTALL#

I use this mode all the time and use PC3 either as a plugin from Edius or as stand alone fed with a high quality AVI (canopus HQ), obviously working as a plugin saves making the intermediate file unless I want to archive it for later re-use.īeware the PC3.2 upgrade, do NOT install this if you buy PC3 since it has bugs and will mess up certain things, my advice use PC3 as is and wait for a later upgrade that works properly. The mastering quality is nice particularly if you have time to let it do a two pass and two pass VBR saves space as well.








Canopus procoder 2 vs procoder 3